Course Reserves, Copyright, and the GSU decision

Finally Judge Evans has handed down her ruling on copyright and course reserves in the Cambridge, Oxford, and Sage publishers v. Georgia State University. Many university and college libraries, including us, have been waiting for a decision in this case before reviewing their own course reserve policies. The case will almost certainly be appealed, but even so we now have some guidance. Over the summer we will be reviewing our policies in relationship to Judge Evans' ruling  and seeing if we need to make any changes.

I am going to be using this post to collect various resources about the decision.

• The ruling.
• Justia's Dockets & Filings.
• Kevin Smith's post on the decision.
• The Chronicle's article.
• The Inside Higher Ed article.
• James Grimmelmann's post on the decision.
• Atlanta Journal Constitution article.
• Bloomberg's article.
• Publishers Weekly article (which, touchingly, in the headline at least spins the decision in the other direction.)
• TechDirt post.
• Paid Content post.
• Ars Technica post.
• GSU Official response
• Matthew Dames' post on the decision
• Copyright Clearance Center statement 
• ARL Issue Brief .
• Jonathan Pink's post on the decision. 
• Cambridge University Press response to the decision.
• Barbara Fister's post on the decision.
• AAP's statement on the decision.
• The Library Journal article. 
• Karen Petruska's posts. Part 1 and Part 2. 
• Christine Ross' post on the decision. 

• The publishers' proposed injunction.
• Kevin Smith's response to the proposed injunction.

So, do you know of any other posts that should go here?